APHC010512542025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 10107/2025 Between: 1. BHUKYA RAMARAO NAIK, S/O SAKRIYA NAIK, AGED 54 YEARS, R/O 2-198,GUDIPADU KROSURU MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1. BHUKYA VENKATESWARLU NAIK, S/O BALU NAIK, 38 YEARS, R/O YERRABALEM VILLAGE, KROSURU MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATI. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Courtmay be pleased to cancel the bail that was granted to the 1st respondent/accused in Crl.M.P.No. 1439/2025 on the file of Hon'ble PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE GUNTUR. In the Cr.No. 122/2025 of Krosuru P.S. in the interest of Justice, else the petitioner will be put to irreparable loss. Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. SOMISETTY GANESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 2 1. SAMANTHA KRISHNA SRIRAMAKAVACHAM 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 3. LEGAL AID The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 10107 of 2025 Order: The Criminal Petition is filed under Section 483(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity, ‘the BNSS’), by the petitioner seeking to cancel the bail granted to the respondent No.1/accused, vide order, dated 12.09.2025 passed in Crl.M.P.No.1439 of 2025 on the file of the learned Principal District & Sessions Judge, Guntur, in Crime No.122/2025 of Krosuru Police Station. 2. Case of the prosecution is that the accused with an intent to kill the deceased, brutally murdered the deceased with an axe and also dragged the dead body of the deceased to the nearby Vagu and dug the mud with a crowbar and buried the same and placed thorny bushes to cause disappearance of evidence. 3. Heard Sri Somisetty Ganesh Babu, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. K. Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing the respondent No.2/State. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that investigation in this matter is still pending and several independent witnesses are to be examined. The release of accused on bail at this crucial stage would seriously hamper the progress of the investigation and trial. Therefore, prays to allow the petition. 4 5. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that on 12.10.2025 charge sheet was filed and it is further submitted that the accused has not violated the conditions imposed while granting bail. 6. Considering the submission made, it is not the case that the accused failed to comply with the conditions imposed by the trial Court while granting bail and therefore, the petition is liable to be dismissed. 7. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. ________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 21.01.2026 ARB 5 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 10107 of 2025 Date: 21.01.2026 ARB