Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2474 (JK)

NAJMA AKHTER AND ANOTHER v. UT OF J AND K TH. COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS, JAMMU AND OTHERS

WP(C)/2599/2026 · 2026-08-19

Rajnesh Oswal

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Sr. No. 254 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Uploaded on: 19.08.2026 WP(C) No. 2599/2026 Najma Akhter and Anr. . …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Parv Sharma, Advocate & Mr. Varshul Tayotra, Advocate vice Mr. Paramjeet Singh Khera, Adv. q vs Union Territory of J&K and ors. .…. Respondent(s) Through: Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG with Ms. Sagira Jaffer, Advocate Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE ORDER 19.08.2026 01. The grievance of the petitioners is that being majors, they have solemnized their marriage as per Muslim rites on 17.07.2026 with their free will and without any pressure, threat or coercion. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the respondent No. 8 is continuously harassing and threatening the petitioners of dire consequences despite knowing the fact that the petitioners have solemnized their marriage. The petitioners have raised an apprehension of a threat to their life at the hands of private respondent. In support of her claim regarding age, petitioner No. 1 has placed on record her Grade Card of the Secondary School Examination, while petitioner No. 2 has placed on record a copy of the School Leaving Certificate issued by the 2 WP(C) No. 2599/2026 Headmaster, Mdl./Pry. School, Surankote. The petitioners have also placed on record a copy of the Nikahnama. 02. Without commenting upon the validity of the marriage, this writ petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to the petitioners that in the event they apprehend any threat to their life and liberty at the hands of the respondent No. 8, they shall approach respondent No. 7 i.e. SHO, Police Station, Reasi, who shall look into the grievance of the petitioners and if found genuine, he shall provide protection to the petitioners against the threats from respondent No. 8. It is, however, made clear that this order shall not be construed as a stamp of approval of the marriage solemnized between the petitioners, nor shall it come in the way of any investigation, if any FIR has been registered. 03. Disposed of. (RAJNESH OSWAL) JUDGE Jammu 19.08.2026 Karam Chand Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No KARAM CHAND 2026.08.19 02:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document