Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:2239 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(C) No.226 of 2026
1. Lakhan Rai aged about 62 years, son of Late Budhan Rai
2. Mithu Rai aged about 55 years, son of Late Budhan Rai Both resident of Village Bagdumi, P.O.-Khairbani, P.S.- Masalia, District-Dumka …… Petitioners Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand.
2. The Commissioner, Santhal Paragana Division, P.O. and P.S.- Dumka, District- Dumka.
3. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Dumka, P.O.-Dumka, P.S. Dumka, District- Dumka.
4. The Circle Officer, Masalia, P.O. and P.S. Masalia, District- Dumka.
5. Most. Sundari Ghatwalin wife of Late Manu Rai.
6. Kistu Rai son of Late Manu Rai.
7. Dhodho Rai son of late Manu Rai.
8. Sita Ram Rai son of Late Manu Rai
9. Mossomat Kalawati Ghatwalin widow of Doman Rai.
10. Pagla Rai son of Late Doman Rai.
11. Bogala Rai son of Doman Rai.
12. Jitan Rai son of Doman Rai.
13. Shankar Rai son of Late Sanu Rai. Respondent No. 5 to 9 are resident of Village- Bagdumi, P.O. + PS – Masalia, Khairbani, and 10 to 13 are residents of Village- Barakol, P.O.- Pindari, P.S.- Masalia, District- Dumka. …... Respondents ---------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR --------- For the Petitioners : Mr. Sanjeev Thakur, Advocate Mr. Jagat Kr. Soni, Advocate For the Resp.-State : Mr. Sahbaj Akhtar, AC to AAG-III --------
02/Dated: 29
th January, 2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The present writ petition has been filed for the following relief :-
“(a) for issuance of appropriate writ(s)/ order(s)/ direction (s) in the nature of mandamus directing upon the respondents to demark the land of the - 1 - W.P.(C) No.226 of 2026
2026:JHHC:2239 petitioners in view of decision in partition suit between the parties, as private respondents are disturbing the possession of the petitioners without any rhymes and reason ignoring the final decree passed in the partition suit.”
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to work out his remedy in accordance with law.
4.
Learned counsel for the State has raised no objection.
5. With the aforesaid liberty, the present writ petition is, hereby, disposed of.
6. In view of above order, no notice is required to be issued upon the private respondents.
7. Pending interlocutory application, if any, stands
disposed of.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.) 29th January, 2026 Ravi-Chandan/- Uploaded on 30.01.2026 - 2 - W.P.(C) No.226 of 2026