Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:26310
1 W.P.(C) No. 3552 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
----
W.P.(C) No. 3552 of 2014
---- 1.Rani Devi, wife of Hindlal Paswan, resident of Nai Sarai, PO and PS Nai Sarai, District Ramgarh 2.Pankaj Kumar Singh, son of Shiv Narayan Singh, resident of Ranchi Road, Marar, PO and PS Marar, District Ramgarh 3.Babita Singh, wife of late Rajendra Prasad Singh, resident of Village Marar, PO and PS Marar, District Ramgarh
…… …. .... Petitioner(s) -- Versus --
1.The State of Jharkhand
2.Principal Secretary, Department of Land and Revenue, Department of Jharkhand, at Project Building, Dhurwa, PO and PS Dhurwa, District Ranchi
3.Commissioner, North Chhotanagpur Division, Hazaribag, PO and PS Hazaribag, District Hazaribag
4.Deputy Commissioner, Ramgarh, PO and PS Ramgarh, District Ramgarh
5.Additional Collector, Ramgarh, PO and PS Ramgarh, District Ramgarh
6.Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Ramgarh, PO and PS Ramgarh, District Ramgarh
7.Circle Officer, Ramgarh, PO and PS Ramgarh, District Ramgarh
…… ….. .... Respondents
---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
---
For the Petitioner(s) :- Mr. Vibhor Mayank, Advocate
For the State
:- Mr. Ratnesh Kumar, Advocate
---- 32/01.09.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
2026:JHHC:26310
2 W.P.(C) No. 3552 of 2014 petitioners as well as the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent State. 2. This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for direction upon the authority concerned to issue the rent-receipt and also to quash the notice dated 19.11.2019 in Doubtful Jamabandi Case No.01/19-20. 3. Mr. Vibhor Mayank, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that during pendency of the present writ petition the Doubtful Jamabandi Case was opened which has been challenged by way of amendment and that has been allowed by the order dated 02.08.2022. He next submits that wrongly the Doubtful Jamabandi Case has been initiated however the petitioners are in possession. 4. The learned counsel for the respondent State submits that once the Doubtful Jamabandi proceeding is there, the petitioners can take all the objections in the said case to find out the prima-facie case, and if the petitioners present their case before authority concerned, proper order can be passed by the authority concerned where the Doubtful Jamabandi Case is pending. 5. In view of above, at this stage, Mr.
Mayank, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, on instruction, seeks permission to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to file the objection in the said proceeding taking all the grounds therein. 6. In view of the above, this petition is permitted to be withdrawn and disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to file their objection in the said proceeding and once the objection will be filed, the learned authority will decide the same after providing opportunity of hearing in accordance with law. ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Dated : 01.09.2026 SI/