1 2026:CGHC:27549 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1803 of 2025 1 - Mrs. Geeta Sidar W/o Late Shri Shrawan Sidar Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Ratanmahka, Tehsil Kharsia District Raigarh (C.G.) 2 - Somendra (Sumendra) Sidar S/o Late Sharawan Sidar Aged About 24 Years R/o Village Ratanmahka, Tehsil Kharsia District Raigarh (C.G.) ... Petitioners versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralay, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Chattisgarh Board Of Revenue Through Its Secretary, Mungeli Road, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Collector District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 4 - Sub Division Officer (Revenue) Kharsia, District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 5 - Taihsildar Tehsil Kharsia, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 6 - Ramesh Rathore S/o Late Shri Shiv Prasad Rathore R/o Village- Ratanmahka, Tehsil Kharsia, District Raigarh, (C.G.) 7 - Amarnath S/o Shri Jethuram R/o Village- Ratanmahka, Tehsil- Kharsia, District Raigarh, (C.G.) 8 - Prahlad Yadav S/o Shri Shivprasad Yadav Aged About 36 Years R/o Village- Ratanmahka, Tahsil- Kharsia, Police Station Kharsia, District Raigarh (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Ms. Pragati Pandey, Advocate For State : Dr. Arham Siddiqui, Panel Lawyer YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2026.07.04 12:31:40 +0530 2 Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 03.07.2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that for a considerable period she has not been in contact with the petitioners and, therefore, has no instructions in the matter. 2. Mr. Saumitra Kesharwani, learned Panel Lawyer, appears on behalf of the State. 3. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners that she has no instructions in the matter, the present writ petition is dismissed for want of instructions. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh