K. Shanta Devi v. V. Venkatram died per lRs 3 and 4
AS/505/2006 · 2026-02-03
Venuthurumalli Gopala Krishna Rao
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24732 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24732 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
I.A.Nos. 2 AND 3 OF 2025 IN/AND A.S.No. 505 OF 2006
COMMON JUDGMENT:
I.A.No. 2 OF 2025 :
This interlocutory application is filed seeking to permit petitioner No. 1- respondent No. 3 to sign in the memorandum of terms of compromise and appear as general power of attorney holder on behalf of petitioner No. 2- respondent No. 4. 2. Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, petitioner No. 2- respondent No. 4 has appeared through virtual mode and petitioner No. 1- respondnet No. 3, appellant No. 3 and appellant No. 4, who is general power of attorney holder for appellant Nos. 1 and 2, are physically present in the Court hall. Petitioner No. 2-respondent No. 4 has represented through virtual mode that she has given general power of attorney to petitioner No. 1- respondent No. 3 to appear and sign on terms of compromise on her behalf. Both the parties are identified by their respective counsel. 3. For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit filed in support of the application, petitioner No. 1-respondent No. 3 is permitted to sign in the memorandum of terms of compromise and appear as general power of attorney holder on behalf of petitioner No. 2-respondent No. 4. 4. I.A.No. 2 of 2025 is accordingly allowed. 2
I.A.No. 3 OF 2025 IN/AND A.S.No. 505 OF 2006:
5. I.A.No. 3 of 2025 is filed seeking to record the memorandum of compromise arrived at between the parties in A.S.No. 505 of 2006 and pass a decree in terms thereof. 6. Appellant No. 3, appellant No. 4, who is general power of attorney holder for appellant Nos. 1 and 2, and respondent No. 3 are physically present in the Court hall and respondent No. 4 has appeared through virtual mode. Sri V.S.R.Anjaneyulu, learned senior counsel, representing Sri V.Satyanarayana Prasad, learned counsel appearing for the appellants and Sri V.Lakshminarayana, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 3 and 4, are present and they have identified their respective parties. Appellant Nos. 3 and 4 and respondent No. 3 produced Photostat copies of aadhaar cards in proof of their identity and they have represented that they compromised the matter by way of memorandum of compromise and the appeal may be disposed of by recording the same. 7.
In view of the same, I.A.No. 3 of 2025 is allowed recording the memorandum of compromise and A.S.No. 505 of 2006 is disposed of in terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties. 8. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand disposed of in consequence. No costs. 3
9. The Registry is directed to annex a copy of the memorandum of compromise to this judgment. _______________________________ JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO Date: 04.02.2026 JSK
4
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
I.A.Nos. 2 AND 3 OF 2025 IN/AND A.S.No. 505 OF 2006
DATE: 04-02-2026
JSK