Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24730 (PNJ)

ARPIT SINGLA v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/19351/2026 · 2026-06-23

Ramesh Kumari, Vikas Bahl

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP Nos.19351 and 19354 of 2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (206) CWP-19351-2026 Date of decision: June 23rd, 2026 Arpit Singla .....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents (207) CWP-19354-2026 Date of decision: June 23rd, 2026 Bharat Bhushan .....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMARI Present: Mr. Harpreet Singh Multani, Advocate, and Mr. Karanbir Singh Randhawa, Advocate for the petitioner in CWP-19351-2026. Mr. Ranjit Singh Sidhu, Advocate, and Mr. Randeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioner in CWP-19354-2026. Mr. Jastej Singh, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. The present order would dispose of two writ petitions i.e. CWP-19351-2026 and CWP-19354-2026. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners in both the writ petitions have submitted that the prayer which the petitioners are pressing in both the writ petitions is for uninterrupted videography and CCTV monitoring of the NARESH KUMAR 2026.06.24 14:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgement CWP Nos.19351 and 19354 of 2026 2 inside of the premises, where the election of the President, Vice President and Senior Vice President of the Municipal Council and also the oath ceremony of the petitioners along with other persons who have been duly elected as Councillors is to take place. It is submitted that the second prayer that the petitioners are pressing is for a direction to the respondents to hold a meeting with respect to election of the President and Vice-President of the Municipal Council as expeditiously as possible. Reliance in this regard is placed upon the judgment of the Division Bench dated 11.10.2024 passed in CWP-26673-2024 titled as Anil Kumar Versus State of Punjab and others and other connected matters. The relevant portion of the said judgment which has been highlighted is reproduced hereinbelow: “2. The Full Bench of this Court in case titled as Prithvi Raj Vs. State Election Commission, Punjab and others, passed in CWP-3575-2003, decided on 25.07.2007, had observed that power of the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India would be available, where exercise of the said power subserves the progress of the election, facilitates its completion and is exercised to further the election process. Reference can also be made to the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court passed in case titled as Manjinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others, reported as 2019(1) RCR (Civil) 483, in which, it was observed that it is desirable that proper videography of the proceedings at the time of counting of votes is done to maintain transparency and fairness in the election at grassroots level. 3. Keeping in view the above, we are of the opinion that proper videography of the proceedings, at the time of polling and counting of votes with respect to elections for the posts of Sarpanches and Panches of the Gram Panchayats, regarding which the present writ petitions have been filed, would subserve the purpose of free and fair election and would also NARESH KUMAR 2026.06.24 14:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgement CWP Nos.19351 and 19354 of 2026 3 facilitate its completion in a fair manner. Thus, all these civil writ petitions are disposed of with the following directions: - (i) Concerned Deputy Commissioner-cum-District Election Officer as well as Punjab State Election Commission would ensure that there would be proper videography of the proceedings at the time of polling and counting of votes; both inside and outside the polling booths in order to maintain transparency and fairness in the elections and the said videography would be preserved for a period of three years from the date of polling. (ii) Concerned Senior Superintendent of Police is also directed to provide adequate security for the conduct of the said panchayat elections. 4. With the aforesaid observations made and directions issued, all these 22 civil writ petitions are disposed of.” 3. Learned State counsel has submitted that in view of the abovesaid directions, the proper videography of the proceedings would be done of the inside of the premises where the election for the posts of President, Senior Vice President and Vice President of the Municipal Council is to take place. It is further submitted that adequate security would also be provided. Learned State counsel has stated that as per his instructions, the election with respect to the post of President and Vice- President etc. of the Municipal Council, Mansa as well as Kurali will be held within a period of 15 days from today. 4. Keeping in view the abovesaid facts and circumstances, more so in view of the directions issued by the Division Bench of this Court in its order dated 11.10.2024, the present petitions are disposed of with the following directions: NARESH KUMAR 2026.06.24 14:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgement CWP Nos.19351 and 19354 of 2026 4 (i) The concerned Deputy Commissioner/convener is directed to ensure that there is proper uninterrupted videography and CCTV monitoring of the proceedings in which the election for the post of President, Senior Vice President and Vice President of the Municipal Council, Mansa as well as Kurali is to be held. The said videography would be preserved for a period of six months from the date of the meeting and the said period of six months would be further liable to be extended by a competent Court of jurisdiction either hearing the election petition or any other such ancillary matter on a request made by any of the parties. (ii) The respondents would also hold the election of the post of President and Vice-President etc. of the Municipal Council, Mansa as well as Kurali, within a period of 15 days from today. (iii) The concerned Senior Superintendent of Police is also directed to provide adequate security for the conduct of free and fair elections. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE 23.06.2026 (RAMESH KUMARI) naresh.k JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No NARESH KUMAR 2026.06.24 14:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgement