Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24725 (HP)

GOVIND RAM v. THE HPTDCL AND ANOTHER

EX.P./951/2024 · 2026-09-24

Sandeep Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition Nos.951 to 955, 957 to 961, 1298, 1301, 1337 of 2024, CMP-21772 of 2025 in EX.P.-1236 of 2024, CMP-22174 of 2025 in EX.P.-1164 of 2024, EX.P.-1116 of 2025 in CWP-273 of 2024, EX.P.-1965 of 2025 in CWP-6773 of 2024, EX.P.-1966 of 2025 in CWP-9496 of 2023, EX.P.-2350 of 2025 in CWP-5767 of 2024 Date of Decision: 24.09.2025 _______________________________________________________ 1. Ex. Petition No.951 of 24 Govind Ram …….Petitioner Versus The HPTDCL and Anr. … Respondents 2. Ex. Petition No.952 of 24 Tek Singh …….Petitioner Versus The HPTDCL and Anr. … Respondents 3. Ex. Petition No.953 of 24 Hira Singh …….Petitioner Versus The HPTDCL and Anr. … Respondents 4. Ex. Petition No.954 of 24 Chander Mani …….Petitioner Versus The HPTDCL and Anr. … Respondents 5. Ex. Petition No.955 of 24 Devi Chand …….Petitioner Versus The HPTDCL and Anr. … Respondents 6. Ex. Petition No.957 of 24 Fateh Chand …….Petitioner Versus The HPTDCL and Anr. … Respondents 7. Ex. Petition No.958 of 24 Mehar Chand …….Petitioner Versus The HPTDCL and Anr. … Respondents 8. Ex. Petition No.959 of 24 Rattan Chand …….Petitioner Versus 2 The HPTDCL and Anr. … Respondents 9. Ex. Petition No.960 of 24 Trilok Chand …….Petitioner Versus The HPTDCL and Anr. … Respondents 10. Ex. Petition No.961 of 24 Revat Ram …….Petitioner Versus The HPTDCL and Anr. … Respondents 11. Ex. Petition No.1298 of 24 Chaman Lal …….Petitioner Versus The HPTDCL and Anr. … Respondents 12. Ex. Petition No.1301 of 24 Parkash Chand …….Petitioner Versus The HPTDCL and Anr. … Respondents 13. Ex. Petition No.1337 of 24 Roshan Lal …….Petitioner Versus The HPTDCL and Anr. … Respondents 14. CMP No.21772 of 2024 in Ex. Petition No.1236 of 2024 Dharam Pal Sharma …….Petitioner Versus The HPTDCL and Anr. … Respondents 15. CMP No.22174 of 2025 in Ex. Petition No.1164 of 2024 Om Prakash …….Petitioner Versus The HPTDCL and Anr. … Respondents 16. Ex. Petition No.1116 of 2025 Tara Chand …….Petitioner Versus The HPTDCL and Anr. … Respondents 17. Ex. Petition No.1965 of 2025 Jaswant Singh …….Petitioner Versus The HPTDCL and Anr. … Respondents 18. Ex. Petition No.1966 of 2025 Sudershan Kumar …….Petitioner Versus The HPTDCL and Anr. … Respondents 19. Ex. Petition No.2350 of 2025 3 Thakur Chand …….Petitioner Versus The HPTDCL and Anr. … Respondents Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Om Parkash Goel, Advocate. For the Respondent(s): Ms. Suchita Kaintura, Advocate. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Affidavit in compliance to order dated 26.08.2026 passed in Execution Petition No. 951 of 2024 along with Execution Petitions No. 952 to 955 and 957 to 961 of 2024 stands filed, perusal whereof reveals that in terms of the judgment sought to be executed, respondent-Corporation has released the entire retirement benefits of the petitioners, i.e. gratuity and leave encashment. It has been further stated in the compliance affidavit that arrears of revised pay scale, DA and IR have also been released in favour of the petitioners. 2. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly, the same are closed, reserving liberty to the petitioners to get the execution petitions revived in case the amount is not yet credited to their bank account. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge September 24, 2026 (sunil) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?