Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010513242024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 26358/2024 Between:
1. KAMODULA SURI BABU, S/O. APPALA NAIDU AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/O SEETHANNA PET, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
2. MOHAMAD KABEER PASHA,, S/O. ISMAIL AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 8-10-70, WYNCHIPETA, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRI. SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
3. THE ADDITIONAL SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GANNAVARAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT,
4. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, GANNAVARAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
5. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, BHAVANIPURAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction,
more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, the declaring declaring the action of the respondents in interfering the civil disputes i.e., peaceful possession of petitioners property in according to law as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Articles 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently pleased this Honble Court to direct the respondents not to interfere in the peaceful possession of the petitioner property stated supra and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere in the peaceful possession of the petitioners property stated supra and pass such IA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to permit the present proposed respondents herein to implead as party respondents No. 6 & 7 in W.P.No.26358/2024 and as well as in the interlocutory applications therein and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. P B REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 26358/2024
ORDER:-
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“…to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, the declaring declaring the action of the respondents in interfering the civil disputes i.e., peaceful possession of petitioners property in according to law as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Articles 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently pleased this Honble Court to direct the respondents not to interfere in the peaceful possession of the petitioner property stated supra and pass such…”
2. Heard Sri P.B.Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that it is a case of interference of police in the civil disputes.
4. Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that based on the complaint lodged by petitioner against M.Ramesh, M.Suresh and Pandu, the respondent-police was registered a case against the them in Cr.No.674 of 2024 U/Section 329(4), 351(2) r/w 3(5) of BNS dated 17.11.2024. He would further submit that the respondent police never interfered in the civil disputes between the parties.
5.
Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that, recording the same, the writ petition may be disposed of.
6. Recording the above said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the parties are at liberty to work out their remedies before the appropriate forum according to the law. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 02.01.2026 KKV
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
WRIT PETITION NO: 26358/2024
Dated. 02.01.2026
KKV
217
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI MAIN CASE NO: WRIT PETITION NO: 26358/2024 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. Date
ORDER OFFICE NOTE
2.
02.01.2026
Dr.VJP,J
The Writ Petition is disposed of.
(Vide separate order)
________ Dr.VJP, J KKV