PARSHOTAM KUMAR SHARMA v. UT OF J AND K TH. COMMISSIONER SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS
WP(C)/2250/2026 · 2026-08-05
Sanjay Parihar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2472 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2472 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C ) No. 2250/2026 CM No. 4863/2026 CAV No. 1839/2026
Parshotam Kumar Sharma
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Abhishek Singh Parihar, Advocate.
vs
U.T of J&K & Ors. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Nazia Fazal, Assisting counsel vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG for R-1&2. Mr. B.R. Chandan, Advocate with Ms. Deepika Sharma, Advocate for R-3 to 5.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE
ORDER 05.08.2026
01. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly conceded that, in view of the subsequent developments, the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous. He further submitted that liberty may be reserved to file a fresh petition, if the cause survives or a fresh cause of action accrues. His statement is taken on record.
02. In view of the above, this petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous, with liberty as prayed for.
03. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Sanjay Parihar)
Judge
Jammu 05.08.2026 Renu
Serial No. 08