Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2472 (ALL)

INDRESH SINGH CHAUHAN v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NABAIL/2998/2026 · 2026-05-05

Jai Prakash Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 2998 of 2026 Court No. - 70 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Rajeev Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record. This anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 0344/2025 under Sections - 115(2), 352, 351(3), 308(7), 111(2)(b), 316(3), 318(4), 61(2)(a) BNS, Police Station - Panki District - Kanpur Nagar, during the pendency of trial. Submission has been made on behalf of the applicant that the applicant has no concern with the offence alleged against him. The applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. No offence has been committed by the applicant. It has further been submitted that the applicant was not named in the FIR. It has also been submitted that no specific allegation has been made by the informant against the applicant in the FIR. The applicant has criminal history of four cases, which have been explained in the present application. In case the applicant is granted anticipatory bail, there is no possibility of misusing the liberty of anticipatory bail. Learned A.G.A. has contended that the accusation levelled against the applicant is specific. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Padmaker Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Indresh Singh Chauhan .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Insofar as the allegations are concerned, the same is very much apparent on record. In this case, bare perusal of the first information report itself shows that the allegations are specific against the applicant. It is also apparent that the applicant has four criminal history of similar nature. No good ground is made out for anticipatory bail. In case the applicant has any grievance, he may avail remedy before the appropriate forum. Consequently, the instant anticipatory bail application is rejected. It is made clear that observation made in this order shall have no bearing on the merits of the case. May 6, 2026 S.K. NABAIL No. 2998 of 2026 2 (Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- SWEETY KANOJIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad