1 2026:CGHC:27548 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 233 of 2023 Umarkot Wale Baba Seva Samiti A Society Registered Under The Provisions Of Chhattisgarh Society Registrikaran Adhiniyam, Office At B-10, Parshuram Nagar Behind Mining Office, Ring Road No.1, Telibandha Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Through Its President, Noor Jahan D/o Nazeer Khan Aged 54 Years President, Umarkot Wale Baba Seva Samiti, R/o B-10, Parshuram Nagar, Telibandha Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Secretary, Department Of Commerce And Industries, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Collector, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh. 4 - Sub Divisional Office (Revenue), Tahsil - Pathariya , District Mungeli Chhattisgarh 5 - Tahsildar, Pathariya, District - Mungeli Chhattisgarh 6 - Station House Officer, Police Station Sargaon, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh 7 - Gram Panchayat -Sava, Janpad Panchayat Pathariya, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh. Through Its Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Sava, Janpad Panchayat-Pathariya, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : None For State : Mr. Saumitra Kesharwani, Panel Lawyer YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2026.07.04 12:31:40 +0530 2 Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 03.07.2026 1. None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioners to press this petition even in two rounds. 2. Mr. Saumitra Kesharwani, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State/respondents, is present. 3. Today, when the case is called, learned counsel for the petitioner is not present nor any representation made on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition on repeated calls and it appears that the petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the matter, as such this Court has left with no other option, but to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh