APHC010511402024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 26614/2024 Between: 1. RAMAVATHU RANGAMMA BAI, W/O. MANTHRU NAIK, AGE ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. D.NO. 1-1115, VIJAYALAKSHMI TOWN SHIP, 5TH LANE, MULAKALURU, NARASARAOPET MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT-522601 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT., 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALNADUDISTRICT, NARASARAOPET. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BAPATIA DISTRICT, BAPATLA. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR DISTRICT, GUNTUR 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NARASARAOPET RURAL POLICE STATION, PALANADU DISTRICT. 6. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KOLLURU POLICE STATION, BAPATLA DISTRICT. 7. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PEDAKAKANI POLICE STATION, GUNTUR DISTRICT, 8. RAMAVATHU SATYA PRIYA, W/O. BHAVANI SANKAR NAIK, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. NALLAJARLA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. CONTACT NO. 9505315163 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No. 5 to 7 are calling the petitioner to Police Station and threatening to settle property to the 8th respondent as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and violative of Articles 21, 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India and consequently to directing the respondent No. 5 to 7 not tointerfere in family property disputes and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to Direct the respondent No. 5 to 7 not tointerfere in family property disputes and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KALE VIJAYA RAJU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 26614/2024 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No. 5 to 7 are calling the petitioner to Police Station and threatening to settle property to the 8th respondent as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and violative of Articles 21, 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India and consequently to directing the respondent No. 5 to 7 not tointerfere in family property disputes and pass…” 2. Heard Sri Kale Vijaya Raju, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that police are calling the petitioner to the police station who is the father in law of the respondent No.8. 4. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, would submit that based on the contents of the complaint made by the 8th respondent, the police called the petitioner to the police station only for enquiry purpose. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would further submit that no crime has been registered against the petitioner since it is a civil matter. He would further submit that the police are not interfering with the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondent No.8. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that, recording the submissions, the writ petition may be disposed of. 6. Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel, the writ petition is disposed of. However, police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties except under due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 02.01.2026 KKV HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 26614/2024 Dated. 02.01.2026 KKV 241 HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI MAIN CASE NO: WRIT PETITION NO: 26614/2024 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. Date ORDER OFFICE NOTE 2. 02.01.2026 Dr.VJP,J The Writ Petition is disposed of. (Vide separate order) ________ Dr.VJP, J KKV