- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31800 WP No. 11228 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 11228 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. VENKATESH MURTHY. S, S/O LATE. SRIRAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, 2. SRI. AYYANAPPA, S/O LATE VENKATARAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, 3. SRI. SATISHA, S/O LATE VENKATARAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, 4. SRI. KRISHNAPPA, S/O LATE VENKATARAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, 5. SRI. GANESH, S/O LATE VENKATARAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, PETITIONER NO.1 TO 5 R/AT BYRAPURA VILLAGE, HESARAGHATTA HOBLI, YELAHANKA TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 088. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. HARI HARA PRASAD., ADVOCATE) AND: Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31800 WP No. 11228 of 2026 1. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BEHIND KANDAYA BHAVANA, KEMPEGOWDA ROAD (K.G. ROAD), BANGALORE - 560 009. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, NORTH SUB-DIVISION, KANDAYA BHAVANA, KEMPEGOWDA ROAD (K.G. ROAD), BANGALORE - 560 009. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, YELAHANKA TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 064. 4. SRI. NARAYANAPPA, S/O LATE HANUMANTHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/AT BYRAPURA VILLAGE, HESARAGHATTA HOBLI, YELAHANKA TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 088. 5. SRI. CHIKKEGOWDA, S/O GOVINDAPPA. T, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/AT BYRAPURA VILLAGE, HESARAGHATTA HOBLI, YELAHANKA TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 088. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SPOORTHY HEGDE N., HCGP FOR R1 TO R3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO I. CALL FOR RECORDS FROM THE 1ST RESPONDENT IN RESPECT OF R.P.NO.412/2024; II. SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31800 WP No. 11228 of 2026 1ST RESPONDENT IN RESPECT OF R.P.NO.412/2024, DATED.04.11.2025 VIDE ANNEXURE A IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER In this writ petition, petitioners are assailing the order dated 04.11.2025 (Annexure-A) in R.P.No.412/2024 passed by respondent No.1 and orders dated 11.08.2025 and 15.03.2024 (Annexures - B and C) passed by respondent No.2. 2. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having perused the petition papers, it is forthcoming from the impugned orders that the respondent - authorities have passed the orders to continue the katha in the name of both the grantees i.e., petitioners and one Narasimha Murthy. Therefore, I am of the view that, no interference is called for in this writ petition. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31800 WP No. 11228 of 2026 With these observations, petition stands dismissed. However, it is open for the parties to establish their rights over the property in the manner known to law. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE BSV/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21