IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 106 CWP No.19345 of 2026 Date of decision: June 24th, 2026 Welfare Committee, Sector 27-D, Chandigarh .....Petitioner Versus Union Territory of Chandigarh and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMARI Present: Mr. Alok Mittal and Mr. Mukul Gupta, Advocates for the petitioner. Ms. Madhu Dayal, Additional Standing Counsel with Mr. Dhruv Walia, Junior Panel Counsel for UT/respondents No.1 to 4. Mr. Arnav Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.6. VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel appearing for respondents No.1 to 4 has at the outset very fairly submitted that no bid has been received for the plot in question in pursuance of the notice dated 02.06.2026 and thus, nothing survives in the present petition. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in view of the same, the present petition be disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. 3. Disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE June 24th, 2026 (RAMESH KUMARI) Puneet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No PUNEET SACHDEVA 2026.06.24 13:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh