[2026:RJ-JP:16392] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6900/2026 1. Girraj S/o Late Shri Bhorilal, Aged About 62 Years, R/o Manpur, Police Station Manpur, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa (Raj.) 303509 2. Hajari Lal S/o Late Shri Bhorilal, Aged About 60 Years, R/ o Manpur, Police Station Manpur, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa (Raj.) 303509 3. Manohar S/o Shri Lallu, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Manpur, Police Station Manpur, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa (Raj.) 303509 4. Ramesh S/o Shri Lallu, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Manpur, Police Station Manpur, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa (Raj.) 303509 5. Mukesh S/o Shri Lallu, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Manpur, Police Station Manpur, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa (Raj.) 303509 6. Raju S/o Shri Lallu, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Manpur, Police Station Manpur, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa (Raj.) 303509 7. Smt. Tophli W/o Lallu, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Manpur, Police Station Manpur, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa (Raj.) 303509 8. Smt. Bacchi Devi W/o Pappu, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Manpur, Police Station Manpur, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa (Raj.) 303509 9. Smt. Seema W/o Moharsingh, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Manpur, Police Station Manpur, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa (Raj.) 303509 10. Smt. Suman Devi W/o Kamlesh, Aged About 40 Years, R/ o Manpur, Police Station Manpur, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa (Raj.) 303509 11. Kishan Lal S/o Shri Jansi, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Manpur, Police Station Manpur, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa (Raj.) 303509 12. Ramkishan S/o Shri Jansi, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Manpur, Police Station Manpur, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa (Raj.) 303509 [2026:RJ-JP:16392] (2 of 4) [CW-6900/2026] 13. Sitaram S/o Shri Jansi, Aged About 62 Years, R/o Manpur, Police Station Manpur, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa (Raj.) 303509 ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Chief Secretary Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, 2. The Principle Secretary, Department Of Panchayati Raj, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. The District Collector, Dausa, (Raj.) 4. The Sub Divisional Officer Sikrai, District Dausa (Rai) 5. The A.E.N. P.W.D., Tehsil Sikrai. District Dausa (Raj.) 6. Tehsildar Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa (Raj.) 7. Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Manpur, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vishram Prajapati Mr. Girdhari Gupta For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI Order 18/04/2026 1. The present writ petition has been filed with following prayers: “It is therefore, humbly prayed that Your Lordship may be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition, call for the entire record of the case and after pusuing the same, construct a road through private land without acquiring it or providing compensation to the [2026:RJ-JP:16392] (3 of 4) [CW-6900/2026] petitioners and may be pleased to issue writ, order or direction in the nature thereof: 1. To direct the respondents to be restrained not to disturb the petitioners to continue their living and no coercive action or force may be used; 2. That respondents be also directed that not to use force or dispossess the petitioners’ on Khasra No. 227, 228, 229 and 230 private landowner situated in Patwar Halka Manpur, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa (Raj.) to direct the cost of the petition in favour of the Petitioners; 3. To pass any other order which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case in favour of the Petitioners. ” 2. Mr. Girdhari Gupta and Mr. Vishram Prajapati, learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the petitioners are Khatedars of Khasra Nos.227, 228, 229 and 230, situated at Patwar Halka Manpur, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa, and the respondents are bent upon to dispossess the petitioners from the said land without following due process of law for constructing a road. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the petitioners have served a representation upon respondents on 17.03.2026 (Annexure-3), wherein it has also been mentioned that this Court vide order dated 14.07.2010 passed in S.B. Civil First Appeal No.286/2010 has directed to maintain status quo, [2026:RJ-JP:16392] (4 of 4) [CW-6900/2026] however, still in defiance of the same, respondents are proceeding ahead. 4. Thus, learned counsel for the petitioners, confines the prayer to the limited extent that the respondents be directed to consider and decide the representation dated 17.03.2026 strictly in accordance with law after considering all the relevant documents relied upon by the petitioners. 5. Taking note of the above, and without delving into the merits of the matter, respondent No.3 – District Collector, Dausa (Raj.) is directed to consider and decide the said representation dated 17.03.2026 (Annexure-3) submitted by the petitioners, by passing a speaking and reasoned order within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, strictly in accordance with law after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and also taking cognizance of the earlier orders passed by this Court. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition stands disposed of. 7. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 8. Needless to say, this order has been passed only to decide the petitioners’ representation(s) and in no manner is to be construed as a direction to decide the said representation(s) in a particular manner. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J DIPESH CHAYAL /5