BHIM SINGH & ORS. v. UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ORS.
W.P.(C)/2137/2026 · 2026-02-16
Amit Mahajan, Anil Kshetarpal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 247 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 247 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
$~78 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2137/2026 BHIM SINGH & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Setu Niket, Ms. Esha Mazumdar & Ms. Muskan Sharma, Advs. versus UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ravinder Agarwal, Mr. Manish Kumar Singh, Mr. Vasu Agarwal and Mr. Lekh Raj Singh, Advs. for UPSC.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN O R D E R %
16.02.2026 CM APPL. 10392/2026 [exemption]
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. Application stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) 2137/2026 & CM APPL. 10391/2026
3. Through the present Writ Petition, the Petitioner seeks following prayers :
“A. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction of like nature, quashing and setting aside the Final Order dated 23.12.2025 passed by the Hon’ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi in O.A. No. 4051 of 2023; B. Pass an order allowing the O.A. No. 4051 of2023 in terms of reliefs prayed therein; This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/02/2026 at 12:59:11
C. Pass any other order or direction as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. D. Award costs of the present petition in favour of the Petitioners and against the Respondents.”
4. The learned counsel representing the Petitioners submits that UPSC had no jurisdiction to recall the recommendations, which had already been made.
5. On being queried by this Court, the learned counsel admitted that this aspect has not been examined by the learned Tribunal, although he claims that this issue was taken up at the time of
arguments.
6. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, learned counsel representing the Petitioner prays for permission to withdraw the present Writ Petition, in order to file review of the impugned order before the learned Tribunal.
7. Ordered accordingly.
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J AMIT MAHAJAN, J FEBRUARY 16, 2026 ‘KDK’ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/02/2026 at 12:59:11