Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24696 (JHR)

BAIDYANATH SINGH @ BAIJ NATH SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./4953/2026 · 2026-08-31

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:26217] -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4953 of 2026 1. Baidyanath Singh @Baijnath Singh, aged about 39 yrs, S/o- Deyali@ Dayali Singh, 2. Suresh Kumar @ Suresh Singh, aged about 26 yrs, S/o- Dineshwar Singh Bhokta @ Dineshwar Singh, 3. Suraj Kumar @Suraj Bhuiyan, aged about 22 yrs, S/o- Dhaneshwar Bhuiyan, 4. Birendra Singh@ Bigan Singh, aged about- 35 yrs, S/o- Dhaneshwar Bhuiyan. All R/o Village Ramkheta, P.O. Kolhaiya, P.S. Rajpur, District Chatra. ..... … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand ..... … Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Sunny Kumar, Advocate. For the State : Mrs. Mohua Palit, A.P.P. ------ 03/ 31.08.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 1138 of 2022, registered for the offence under 33(1)(C) of Indian Forest Act, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Chatra. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that false allegation is made against the petitioners of cultivation of poppy plant in the forest land. He next submits that the said land is not belonging to these petitioners. He further submits that the petitioners are poor villagers and having no criminal antecedent and disclosure to that effect has been made in para-17 of the petition. 4. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are there of cultivation of the [2026:JHHC:26217] -2- poppy plant in the forest land. 5. Considering that the land is of forest department and the petitioners are having no criminal antecedent and disclosure to that effect has been made in para-17 of the petition and further the petitioners are said to be the poor villagers and in the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, above named. 6. Accordingly, the petitioners, named above, are directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today and in the event of their surrender / arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Chatra, in connection with Complaint Case No. 1138 of 2022, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated:-31.08.2026 Amitesh/-