Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24691 (AP)

Sunil Kumar Reddy v. Mr. O. Anand, I.A.S.

CC/2773/2025 · 2026-01-26

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010516072025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2773/2025 Between: 1. SUNIL KUMAR REDDY, S/O I. NAGI REDDY AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O 6-5-472, ANDHRA BANK COLONY, RAM NAGAR, ANANTAPUR TOWN AND DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. MR. O. ANAND, I A S, WORKING AS DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT, ASHOK NAGAR, ANANTAPUR, ANDHRA PRADESH 515001. ...CONTEMNOR Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SAI MANOJ REDDY L Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. SUSHMA YAGANTI The Court made the following: 2 ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri K. Gunasekhar, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri L. Sai Manoj Reddy, learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Smt. Sushma Yaganti, learned Counsel for the Respondent. 2. Smt. Sushma Yaganti, learned Counsel for the Respondent, has passed across the table the Proceeding of the Collector & District Magistrate, Ananthapuramu bearing Rc.No.E5/4712/2025 dated 27.12.2025, which indicates that the subject property has been deleted from the Prohibited Properties List under Section 22A of the Registration Act. 3. Having noted the same, this Court is of the view that the grievance of the Petitioner has been redressed. Accordingly, the present Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. 4. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt:27.01.2026 Vns