Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24689 (JHR)

KAMAL KISHORE PANDIT v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/4946/2026 · 2026-08-28

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:25981 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 4946 of 2026 1. Kamal Kishore Pandit, Aged about-44 years, S/O- Rup Narayan Pandit, Residence Vill-Kamaldiha, P.O-Pathargama, P.S-Pathargama, District- Godda, Jharkhand. 2. Ambika Kumari, Aged about-36 years, D/O-Shrihari Mahto, Residence of Vill- Lowadag, P.O.-Tutikinawadih, P.S-Tutikinawadih, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. 3. Abhishek Kumar, Aged about-36 years, S/o-Kaleshwar Saw, Residence of Vill-Kujra, P.O.-Kujra, P.S-Loharduga, District-Lahardaga, Jharkhand. .... Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. The Principal Secretary, School Education and Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, Having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O.- Dhurwa, P.S.- Jagarnnathpur, Dist-Ranchi 3. The Principal Secretary, Personal Administrative Reforms and Raj Bhasha Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S.-Jagarnnathpur, Dist-Ranchi 4. The Director, Secondary Education, Government of Jharkhand, Having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O.- Dhurwa, P.S-Jagarnnathpur, Dist- Ranchi 5. The Chairman, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, Ranchi, Having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S.- Jagarnnathpur, Dist- Ranchi 6. The Secretary, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, Ranchi, Having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S.-Jagarnnathpur, Dist-Ranchi 7. The Examination Controller, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, Ranchi, Having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O-Dhurwa, P.S.- Jagarnnathpur, Dist- Ranchi .... Respondent(s) -------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shubham Mishra, Advocate Mr. Gyandev Raj, Advocate Mr. Kazi Asif Iqubal, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Sanjoy Piprawall, Advocate Mr. Prince Kumar, Advocate Mr. Jay Prakash, Advocate -------- 2026:JHHC:25981 2 Order No.2 /Dated: 28th August 2026 This writ application has been preferred by the petitioners for a direction upon the respondents to prepare new/revised merit list in respect of 8658 number of vacant posts of Trained Graduate Teachers, as advertised vide Advt. No. 21/2016, dated 28.12.2016 and further to direct the respondents to consider the case of petitioners for appointment as they secured qualifying marks for the post of Trained Graduate Teacher in their respective subjects. 2. At the outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the issue involved in this writ application is same and similar to that of W.P.(S). No. 582 of 2023 (Mina Kumari & Ors. Vs. the State of Jharkhand & Ors.) and other analogous cases, wherein a One-Man Fact- Finding Commission has been constituted and the petitioners want to approach the said Commission ventilating their grievance. 3. There is no objection from the other side. 4. Accordingly, the instant application stands disposed of with the liberty as prayed for. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 28th August 2026 Amit Uploaded on 01/09/2026