Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24687 (AP)

MADE BHUJANGA RAO v. TUMMIDI PURNACHANDRA BHAIRAVI

CRP/3110/2024 · 2026-02-01

Ravi Cheemalapati

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010516672024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] MONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3110/2024 Between: 1. MADE BHUJANGA RAO, S/O APPALASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O D. NO. 5-12, AMALAPADU VILLAGE, VAJRAPUKOTTURU MANDAL, TAHSIL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. TUMMIDI PURNACHANDRA BHAIRAVI, S/o Late Kameswara Rao, Aged about 45 years, Occ Business, R/o D. No. 8-76, Kasibugga Town, Palasa Mandal, Srikakulam District. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toThe above Revision Petition is filed Under Sec - 115 of CPC Against the Decree and Order dt.11-07- 2024 in E.P No. 08 of 2023 in O.S. No. 55 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Court of the Civil Judge, Senior Division Sompeta, Srikakulam District, for the among other IA NO: 1 OF 2024 2 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to condone the delay of 31 days in filing the revision against the orders dt.11-07- 2024 in E.P No. 08 of 2023 in O.S. No. 55 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Senior Civil Judge, Sompeta, Srikakulam District and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay all further proceeding in pursuant to orders dt.11-07-2024 in E.P No. 08 of 2023 in O.S. No. 55 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Senior Civil Judge, Sompeta, Srikakulam District and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T D PANI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following ORDER: Registry has placed on record the case information status, which indicates that the execution petition (EP) filed by the respondents got dismissed for default on 17.07.2025, as DHR is called absent and no representation. In view of the same, the cause in the Civil Revision Petition does not survive for further adjudication and the same has become infructuous. 3 2. Sri T.D. Phani Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, sough liberty to file fresh revision petition in the event the EP is restored. 3. Accordingly, The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, it is open to the petitioner to file a fresh revision petition in the event the EP is restored. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 02.02.2026 ANS 4 238 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3110/2024 Date: 02.02.2026 ANS