1 APHC010505822014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3565] MONDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1720/2014 Between: 1. S.SREE SAI REKHA, HYD & ANR, D/O. S.SIVA SANKARA BABU, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, NIRMAL RATNA APARTMENTS, OPP: R.S.BROTHERS, GANGARAM, CHANDANAGAR, HYDERABAD -500 050. 2. DR. D.M.SNEHAREDDY REDDY,, D/O. DR. DAMODAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, 3-5-28/(1), SUBBARAOPET, TADEPALLIGUDEM WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 534 101. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. SABINKAR BABULAL VIJAYAWADA 2 OTHERS, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, OCC: REGISTRAR DR. NTR UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH - 520 008. 2. DR N V S CHOWDARY, S/O. LATE VENKATA KRISHNA RAO, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, OCC: PRINCIPAL, NRI MEDICAL COLLEGE, NRI ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, MANGALAGIRI ROAD, CHINAKAKANI - 522503, ANDHRA PRADESH,. 3. DR T S R SAI, S/O. T.V.S. RAMANUJACHARYUIU, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCC: VICE PRINCIPAL, NRI MEDICAL COLLEGE, NRI ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, MANGALAGIRI ROAD, CHINAKAKANI - 522503, ANDHRA PRADESH ...CONTEMNOR(S): 2 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents herein under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for their intentional, deliberate and willful violation of the Orders passed by the Hon'ble Court in Writ Petition No.I7918 /2014 on 25.09.2014 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2014(APPL 960 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave to make the Respondent also as party Respondent to the Contempt Case in the interest of justice and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2014(APPL 1065 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner by granting leave to implead Sri T. Ravi Raju, the Vice Chancellor of the respondent University as party respondent No.4 to the above Contempt case and pass IA NO: 3 OF 2014(APPL 1256 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To dispense with the appearance of Petitioner / 2nd respondent in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2015(APPL 203 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave to the petitioners herein to implead the concerned Directors viz., Dr.M.Appa Rao, President, Dr.M.Sumathi, W/o Appa Rao, Director, Dr.Raju N. Manthina, Secretary and Dr. Koneru Sreedhar, Chief Operations Officer as respondents 5 to 8 in C.C.No.1720 of 2014 in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2015(APPL 453 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to file Additional Affidavit in C.C.No.1720 of 2014, and to pass 3 IA NO: 1 OF 2016(APPL 3524 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. GUDURI VENKATESWARA RAO Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. K V BHANU PRASAD 2. A PRABHAKAR RAO 3. THE ADVOCATE GENERAL (AP) The Court made the following: 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1720 of 2014 ORDER:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand) This Contempt Case is filed against the respondents complaining willful disobedience of the order, dated 25.09.2014 passed by this Court in W.P.No.17918 of 2014. 2. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the order of this Court is complied with by the respondents and the petitioners got admission in post-graduate courses. 3. In view of the same, in our considered view, no further adjudication is required in this Contempt Case. 4. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this case shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND _____________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA Dated: 23.02.2026 TM 5 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1720 of 2014 Dated: 23.02.2026 TM