OM PRAKASH AND ANR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY AND ORS
LPA/382/2016 · 2026-08-31
Rajesh Shankar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24677 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24677 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:26224-DB 1 | P a g e
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
L.P.A. No. 285 of 2016
Surendra Prasad Suman & Another
….. Appellants
Versus State of Jharkhand & Others
….. Respondents
With
L.P.A. No. 309 of 2016
Chandra Mauli Prasad Sinha & Another ….. Appellants
Versus State of Jharkhand & Others
….. Respondents
With
L.P.A. No. 314 of 2016
Niranjan Prasad Deo & Others
….. Appellants
Versus State of Jharkhand & Others
….. Respondents
With
L.P.A. No. 319 of 2016
Surendra Prasad Suman & Another
….. Appellants
Versus State of Bihar & Others
….. Respondents
With
L.P.A. No. 382 of 2016
Om Prakash & Another
….. Appellants
Versus State of Jharkhand & Others
….. Respondents
With
L.P.A. No. 492 of 2016
Ashok Kumar Gupta & Others
….. Appellants
Versus State of Jharkhand & Others
….. Respondents
-----
CORAM
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR
----- For the Appellants: Mr. Sanjeet Nayak, Advocate
Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advocate
Mr. Manoj Tandon, Advocate For the State:
Mr. Sanjoy Kumar Tiwari, S.C.-I
Mr. Krishna Kumar Bhatt, A.C. to S.C.-I
Mr. Gaurang Jajodia, A.C. to G.P.-II For the Respondents: Mr. Saurav Arun, Advocate
Mr. Bhanu Kumar No. 1, Advocate
Mr. Rohit Ranjan, Advocate
-----
16/31.08.2026
1. Learned counsel for the appellants submit that the reliefs sought in these appeals have now been rendered infructuous because most of the appellants have already retired and others are on
2026:JHHC:26224-DB 2 | P a g e
the verge of retirement. They point out that the issue raised in these appeals pertains to finalization of inter-se seniority. Such finalization, at this stage, would make no difference once they have retired or are on the verge of retirement. It is submitted that some of the appellants have already secured promotion based on their respective seniority position in the seniority list.
2. By accepting the above submission, we dispose of these appeals as infructuous.
3. Pending interlocutory application(s) is/are disposed of.
(M. S. SONAK, C.J.)
(RAJESH SHANKAR, J.) 31.08.2026 Satish/Vikas/