IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP No. 16748 of 2026. Decided on : 25 th September , 2026 Ramesh Chand ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents. Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Ms. Anita Kumari Jalota, Advocate. For the respondents: Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Notice. Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on behalf of respondents. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter has been heard at this stage. 3. Petitioner seeks applicability of Sunder Singh vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors.2 and Balo Devi & Ors. vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors.3. It is, however, seen from the record that the petitioner has not preferred any representation for the redressal of his grievances raised in the writ petition. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 Civil Appeal No. 6309 of 2017 decided on 08.03.2028. 3 Civil Appeal No. 4792 of 2022 decided on 18.07.2022. 2 4. Confronted with above, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be preferring a representation within two weeks from today. In case such a representation is so made, the same shall be decided by the competent authority in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgments within a period of six weeks thereafter. The order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioner. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 25th September, 2026. (jai)