APHC010510632024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 26326/2024 Between: 1. L.V. POWER LOOMS,, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR SMT V. YASODHA PLOT NO.3, SURVERY NO.15, GANDHIPURAM, MAHILA UNIVERSITY ROAD, THIRUPATHI ,THIRUPATI DISTRICT. 2. V. YASODHA,, W/O V. RAMADASU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS. PLOT NO.3, SURVERY NO. 15, GANDHIPURAM, THIRUPATHI, RESIDING AT D.NO- 23-5-321/2, GAYATHRI NAGAR, MAHILA UNIVERSITY ROAD, THIRUPATI, THIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 3. V. RAMADASU,, . S/O V. RAMAPPA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS. PLOT NO.3, SURVERY NO. 15, GANDHIPURAM, THIRUPATHI RESIDING AT D.NO- 23-5-321/2, GAYATHRI NAGAR, MAHILA UNIVERSITY ROAD, THIRUPATI, THIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THIRUPATI DISTRICT, AT THIRUPATI. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THIRUPATI DISTRICT, AT THIRUPATI. 4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHANDRAGIRI, THIRUPATI DISTRICT. 5. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MR PALLI POLICE STATION, THIRUPATI. 6. CHINNA GOVINDU, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MR PALLI POLICE STATION, THIRUPATI. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Authorities, especially the Respondent No. 5, in interfering with the liberty and Civil disputes of the petitioners with regard to the shop located at Sy. No. 15, Plot No. 3, Gandhipuram, Thummalagunta Road, Thirupati, as illegal, unlawful and violation of Articles 14, 19, 21 and SOOAofthe Indian constitution and consequently direct the Respondent Authorities, especially the Respondent No. 5, not to interfere with the liberty and the Civil disputes of the petitioners with regard to the shop located at Sy. No. 15, Plot No. 3, Gandhipuram, Thummalagunta Road, Thirupati, and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondent authorities, especially the 5*^ respondent not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment with regard to the shop located at Sy. No. 15, Plot No. 3, Gandhipuram, Thummalagunta Road, Thirupati pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. ANCHA PANDURANGA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 26326/2024 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Authorities, especially the Respondent No. 5, in interfering with the liberty and Civil disputes of the petitioners with regard to the shop located at Sy. No. 15, Plot No. 3, Gandhipuram, Thummalagunta Road, Thirupati, as illegal, unlawful and violation of Articles 14, 19, 21 and SOOAofthe Indian constitution and consequently direct the Respondent Authorities, especially the Respondent No. 5, not to interfere with the liberty and the Civil disputes of the petitioners with regard to the shop located at Sy. No. 15, Plot No. 3, Gandhipuram, Thummalagunta Road, Thirupati, and to pass…” 2. Heard Sri Ancha Pandu Ranga Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that, it is a case of interference of police in the civil disputes. 4. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri P. Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that, there is a case and counter case between the petitioners and the unofficial respondents. The learned Assistant Government Pleader would further submit that the police have never interfered in the civil disputes between the parties. 5. Learned counsel or the petitioners would submit that recording the same, the writ petition may be disposed of. 6. Recording the submissions, the writ petition is disposed of. However, police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties except under due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 02.01.2026 KKV HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 26326/2024 Dated. 02.01.2026 KKV 237 HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI MAIN CASE NO: WRIT PETITION NO: 26326/2024 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. Date ORDER OFFICE NOTE 2. 02.01.2026 Dr.VJP,J The Writ Petition is disposed of. (Vide separate order) ________ Dr.VJP, J KKV