Neutral Citation No. ( 2026:HHC:41217 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Contempt Petition No.442 of 2026 Date of decision: 25.09.2026 Pawan Kumar & Ors. ….Petitioners Versus Rakesh Kanwar & another ….Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, J. Whether approved for reporting ?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge(Oral): Compliance affidavit stands filed, wherein, it has been stated that in compliance to judgment dated 07.11.2024 in CWP No.12311 of 2024, the representations of the petitioners have been considered and decided vide order dated 15.09.2026, wherein, it has been found that the services of the petitioners are liable to be counted as qualifying service for the purpose of pension only subject to legal remedy, if any. 2. Therefore, in view of the above, at this stage, no further order is required to be passed in the present contempt petition and accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. However, the petitioners are at liberty to assail the aforesaid office order dated 15.09.2026, if they still remain aggrieved. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge September 25, 2026 (reena) 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement?