Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24671 (MAD)

Solaishanmugam Thamaraikannan v. The Deputy Commissioner (ST) (GST) (Appeal),

WP/20088/2026 · 2026-05-20

G R Swaminathan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 20088 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 20-05-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.No.20088 of 2026 and W.M.P.21487 of 2026 Solaishanmugam Thamaraikannan, Trading in the name of Thanviee & Co, Rep.by its Sole Proprietor Solaishanmugam Thamaraikannan, 15/118, Dharapuram Road, Sivanathapuram, Vellakovil, Tiruppur-638 111. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Deputy Commissioner (ST) (GST) (Appeal), Erode and Salem, Goods and Services Tax Department, Integrated New Commercial Tax Building, 3rd Floor, S.F.No.400/1, 7, 8, 46, Pudur B Village, Erode-638 002. 2.Assistant Commissioner (ST), Vellakovil Assessment Circle, No.720, Tiruppur Main Road, Kangeyam-638 701. ..Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the impugned order Reference Number-ZD330426128343N dated 16.04.2026 passed by the first respondent and quash the same and consequently, direct the first respondent to hear the appeal filed by the petitioner on merits. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 20088 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 For Petitioner(s) : Mr.S.Girissh For Respondents : Mrs.P.Selvi Government Advocate O R D E R Heard Mr.S.Girissh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mrs.P.Selvi, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents. 2. The writ petitioner suffered an adverse assessment order at the hands of the second respondent. The petitioner filed an appeal before the first respondent after the limitation period expired. However, it was within the condonable period. Yet the first respondent chose to reject the petitioner’s appeal as time barred. Challenging the said order, this Writ Petition has been filed. 3. I am satisfied the petitioner has made out a sufficient cause for condoning the delay. In matters such as this, a liberal approach has to be adopted. I set aside the impugned order passed by the first respondent. The matter is remitted back to the first respondent. The first respondent shall number the appeal and dispose of the same as per law within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 20088 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 4. This Writ Petition is allowed accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 20.05.2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No ssb/vji To 1. The Deputy Commissioner (ST) (GST) (Appeal), Erode and Salem, Goods and Services Tax Department, Integrated New Commercial Tax Building, 3rd Floor, S.F.No.400/1, 7, 8, 46, Pudur B Village, Erode-638 002. 2.Assistant Commissioner (ST), Vellakovil Assessment Circle, No.720, Tiruppur Main Road, Kangeyam-638 701. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 20088 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ssb/vji W.P.No.20088 of 2026 and W.M.P.21487 of 2026 20-05-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis