IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11198 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-292 Year-2025 Thana- BHAGWANPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Mukesh Sahani Son of Shival Sahani, Resident of Village - Raghunathpur, P.S.- Bhagwanpur, District – Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satya Nand Shukla, A.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Vasant Vikas, Advocate. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 3 23-04-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No.292 of 2025 instituted under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 118(2), 352, 351(2), 109, 115(2), 303(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. 3. As per the prosecution case, due to non-payment of a packet of Kurkure, some altercation took place between the co-accused Vidya Sahani and his son one day prior to the incident. It is alleged that on the day of incident, all the accused persons armed with various weapons assaulted the informant and his family members causing injury to them. Specific allegation against the petitioner is that he threw hot oil on the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11198 of 2026(3) dt.23-04-2026 2/3 body of Manita Devi and Raveena Kumari causing injury to them. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that for the same incident, there is case and counter case between the parties. Learned counsel submits that due to petty dispute with respect to some quarrel between the children, the present occurrence taken place in which both the parties received injuries. He further submits that the injuries to the injured is simple in nature. Learned counsel submits that there is delay of 7 days in lodging the F.I.R. without any plausible explanation. He further submits that petitioner has got clean antecedent and he undertakes to cooperate in the investigation and trial of the case. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and the nature of allegation leveled against the petitioner as well as his clean antecedent, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11198 of 2026(3) dt.23-04-2026 3/3 (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur/ concerned Court in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No.292 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Ritik/- (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) U T