Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24668 (JHR)

SUJIT KUMAR GIRI @ SUJIT GIRI @ S. K. GIRI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./4963/2026 · 2026-09-01

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:26361] -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4963 of 2026 Sujit Kumar Giri @ Sujit Giri @ S.K. Giri, aged about 30 years, S/o Krishna Murari Singh, Resident of House No. 13, Ram Nagar Colony, Chas, P.O. & P.S. Chas and District - Bokaro. ..... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ..... … Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Ankit Burman, Advocate. [through V.C.] For the State : Mr. Suraj Deo Munda, A.P.P. ------ 06/ 01.09.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Kasmar P.S. Case No. 14 of 2025, registered for the offence under Section 108 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bokaro. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner through V.C. submits that false allegations are made against this petitioner of taking Rs. 25,000/- from the son of the informant and not arranging the loan in favour of the son of the informant, who has committed suicide. He next submits that the petitioner was working as an employee of Piramal Finance Private Limited. He further submits that the said company has taken the money and this petitioner has not taken any amount and if the loan amount has not been sanctioned by the said company, the petitioner is not responsible, as he is only the employee of the said company. On these grounds, he submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be provided to the petitioner. 4. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer and submits that the case diary has been received and in paras-61 and 62, it has come that the amount has been transferred in the account of one Akshay Sharma, [2026:JHHC:26361] -2- who is an agent of the said company. He next submits that allegations are made in the FIR that the petitioner has taken the money and not arranged the loan to the son of the informant. On these grounds, he submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected. 5. In the FIR, allegations are made of taking Rs. 25,000/- and not arranging the loan from Piramal Finance Private Limited and further in paras-61 and 62 of the case diary, it has come that the said amount has been transferred in the account of one Akshay Sharma, who is an agent of the said company and in the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to surrender before the learned court within four weeks from today and in the event of his surrender / arrest, the petitioner, named above, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty-five thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bokaro, in connection with Kasmar P.S. Case No. 14 of 2025, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated:-01.09.2026 Amitesh/-