Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24667 (PAT)

Birendra Prasad v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./33700/2026 · 2026-07-14

Sandeep Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33700 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-374 Year-2025 Thana- RAXAUL District- East Champaran ====================================================== Birendra Prasad S/o Late Ramchandra Das Resident of village-Raxaul mauze ward no.13, Police Station-Raxaul, District-East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Raushan Kumar S/o Dharmendra Prasad R/o vill - Kalyanpur, P.s.- Kalyanpur, Distt.- East Champaran 3. Ritik Kumar S/o Dharmendra Prasad R/o vill - Kalyanpur, P.s.- Kalyanpur, Distt.- East Champaran 4. Dharmendra Prasad S/o Laxmi Sah R/o vill - Kalyanpur, P.s.- Kalyanpur, Distt.- East Champaran ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Binay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Damodar Prasad Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 14-07-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. 2. This application has been filed for cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted to opposite party nos. 2 to 4 vide order dated 17.10.2025 passed by the learned 7th District and Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, POCSO Act, East Champaran at Motihari, in Anticipatory Bail Petition No. 4842 of 2025, whereby opposite party nos. 2 to 4 have been granted the privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Raxaul P.S. Case No. 374 of 2025, registered for the offences Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33700 of 2026(2) dt.14-07-2026 2/2 punishable under Sections 137(2), 87, 351(2), and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. 3. Perused the records. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and the materials available on record, this Court finds no ground to interfere with the impugned order. 4. Accordingly, the present application is hereby dismissed. Shishir/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T