Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24664 (AP)

NAYAGALLA MADHAVI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/26605/2024 · 2026-01-04

D Ramesh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010510572024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] MONDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 26605/2024 Between: 1. NAYAGALLA MADHAVI, W/O LATE RAMANJANEYULU, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O D.NO.5-127, PALAKURU VILLAGE, BANAGANPALLE MANDAL, NANDYALA DISTRICT ( ERSTWHILE KURNOOL DISTRICT). ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI GUNTUR. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, NANDYALA, NANDYALA DISTRICT ( ERSTWHILE KURNOOL DISTRICT). 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, NADYALA DIVISION, NANDYALA, NANDYALA DISTRICT ( ERSTWHILE KURNOOL DISTRICT). 4. THE TAHSILDAR, BANAGANAPALLI, NANDYALA DISTRICT, ( ERSTWHILE KURNOOL DISTRICT). 5. THE VILLAGE REVENUE OFFICER, PALAKURU VILLAGE, BANAGANAPALLI MANDAL, NANDYALA 2 DISTRICT( ERSTWHILE KURNOOL DISTRICT). 6. S ALI BASHA, S/O ABDUL GAFOOR, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O WARD NO.5 OPPOSITE GOVERNMENT HOSPITAL, PANDLAPURAM VILLAGE, BANAGANPALLE MANDAL, NANDYALA DISTRICT ( ERSTWHILE KURNOOL DISTRICT) 7. S ANWAR BASHA, S/O ASANAH HUSSAIN, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O WARD NO.5 OPPOSITE GOVERNMENT HOSPITAL, PANDLAPURAM VILLAGE BANAGANPALLE MANDAL, NANDYALA DISTRICT ( ERSTWHILE KURNOOL DISTRICT) ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SIRIMALLA DHANA LAKSHMI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. MASALEGAR HIDAYATHULLA The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION No.26605 of 2024 ORDER: The present writ petition is filed seeking the following relief: “….to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the actions of the respondents, in interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner’s property situated in RS No.106-2B to an extent of AC.6.61 cents, Pandlapuram village and Banaganapalli Mandal, Nandyala District(Erstwhile Kurnool District) as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to cease all interference with the petitioner’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of her property situated in RS No.106-2B to an extent of AC.6.61 cents, Pandlapuram village and Banaganapalli Mandal, Nandyala District(Erstwhile Kurnool District)….” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 5 and learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos.6 and 7. 3. After notice, the learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos.6 and 7 has filed a counter. Along with the counter they have also filed the orders passed by the 4th respondent dated 4 31.05.2025. According to the said orders, 1-B adangal has been rectified by mutating the names of unofficial respondent Nos.6 and 7 in respect of the land to an extent of Ac.3.81 cents in Survey No.106-2B situated in Pandlapuram Village of Banaganapalle Mandal, Nandyal District. 4. In the said circumstances, if the petitioner has any grievance against the said orders, the same may be assailed in appropriate proceedings. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Date: 05.01.2026 Ivd 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION No.26605 of 2024 Dated: 05.01.2026 Ivd