2026:HHC:41377 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA COPC No.1491 of 2026 IN CWP No.13369 of 2026 Decided on: 25.09.2026 __________________________________________________________ Shetu Devi .....Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar and another ....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. Bonit Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Varun Chandel, Additional Advocate General. Ranjan Sharma, Judge Petitioner has invoked contempt jurisdiction of this Court, alleging non-compliance of the order dated 06.08.2026 [Annexure C-1], passed by this Court, in CWP No.13369 of 2026, titled as Shetu Devi Versus State of H.P. & others, whereby, the Respondents were directed to allow the petitioner to continue in service till attaining the age of 60 years or till further orders passed by the Court, whichever is earlier. 2. Upon listing of the matter today, Learned Counsel, on Instructions of petitioner, states that the 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:41377 order dated 06.08.2026 [Annexure C-1] has been complied with and the Respondents have allowed the petitioner to re-join her duties [Statement Taken on Record]. 3. Considering the above facts and the statement made by Learned Counsel for the petitioner coupled with the fact that the order stands complied with, therefore, instant proceedings no longer survive and the same are closed accordingly. 4. In aforesaid terms, instant petition and all the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (Ranjan Sharma) Judge September 25, 2026 [Bhardwaj]