1 2026:CGHC:27318 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1073 of 2020 1. Hariram (Died) Through Lrs. As Per Honble Court Order Dated- 26-03-2025. 1.1 - Surendri W/o Late Hariram Aged About 62 Years R/o Village And Post Utekael, Tahsil Pithora, District- Mahasamund (C.G.) 1.2 - Ashok Yadu S/o Late Shri Hariram Aged About 42 Years R/o Village And Post Utekael, Tahsil Pithora, District- Mahasamund (C.G.) 1.3 - Pushpanjali D/o Late Shri Hariram Aged About 42 Years R/o Village And Post Utekael, Tahsil Pithora, District- Mahasamund (C.G.) 1.4 - Anju D/o Late Shri Hariram Aged About 30 Years R/o Village And Post Utekael, Tahsil Pithora, District- Mahasamund (C.G.) ... Petitioners versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Collector Mahasamund, District - Mahasamund Chhattisgarh. 2. Sub - Divisional Officer (Revenue) Pithora, District - Mahasamund Chhattisgarh. 3. Tehsildar Pithora, District - Mahasamund Chhattisgarh. 4. Upper Collector Mahasamund, District – Mahasamund (CG). 5. Tularam, S/o Nripmani Baank, Aged About 71 Years Caste - Rawat, R/o Village - Utekael, P.H. No. 45, Rajaswa Nirikshak Mandal - Sankara, Sub - Tehsil - Sankara, Tehsil Pithora, District - Mahasamund Chhattisgarh., 6. Shreekar, S/o Ujal Rawat, Aged About 45 Years R/o Village - Utekael, P. H. No. 45, Rajaswa Nirikshak Mandal - Sankara, Sub - Tehsil - Sankara, Tehsil Pithora, District - Mahasamund Chhattisgarh. 7. Saudagar, S/o Ujal Rawat, Aged About 42 Years R/o Village - Utekael, P. H. No. 45, Rajaswa Nirikshak Mandal - Sankara, Sub - Tehsil - Sankara, Tehsil Pithora, District - Mahasamund Chhattisgarh. 8. Bhaskar, S/o Ujal Rawat, Aged About 44 Years R/o Village - Utekael, P. H. No. 45, Rajaswa Nirikshak Mandal - Sankara, 2 Sub - Tehsil - Sankara, Tehsil Pithora, District - Mahasamund Chhattisgarh. 9. Naib Tehsildar Pithora, District - Mahasamund Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Surfaraj Khan, Advocate For Respondents-State : Mr. Karan Baharani, Panel Lawyer SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Part Prateem Sahu Order on Board 02/07/2026 1. Learned counsel for petitioners would submit that by efflux of time this writ petition is rendered infructuous as the proceeding pending before the Additional Collector Mahasamund, who has passed the order under challenge, has been dismissed for want of prosecution. 2. In view of above submission of learned counsel for petitioners, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. However, petitioners will be at liberty to file appropriate proceeding, if any exigency arises in future. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge roshan/-