Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24647 (CAL)

RUPSANA BEGAM v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA(H)/49/2026 · 2026-06-22

Debangsu Basak, Md Shabbar Rashidi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Dd 1 22.06.2026 [Bench Id:266046] In the High Court At Calcutta CONSTITUTION WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE WPA(H)/49/2026 RUPSANA BEGAM VS THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. Mr. Dhananjay Banerjee, Advocate Mr. Archan Dutta, Advocate Mr. Partha Sarathi Mishra, Advocate … … For the Petitioner Mr. Dibasish Basu, Advocate Ms. Sneha Dutta, Advocate Mr. Purnendu Das, Advocate … … For the State 1. Petitioner before us is the mother of the missing person. 2. Apparently, the missing person is a minor. 3. Missing person was recovered. 4. Missing person recorded a statement under Section 183 of the BNSS where, she stated that she went away voluntarily with a person. 5. Court is informed that the missing person is presently at a home. 6. No further order need be passed in the present habeas corpus writ petition since, the missing person was recovered. 7. WPA(H)/49/2026 is accordingly disposed of. 8. This order will not prevent the writ petitioner from taking appropriate steps so far as the custody of the missing person is concerned. [Debangsu Basak, J.] [Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.] DEBABR ATA DAS Digitally signed by DEBABRATA DAS Date: 2026.06.23 10:27:24 +05'30'