( 2026:HHC:41214 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Contempt Petition No.681 of 2026 Date of decision: 25.09.2026 Sukh Dass ….Petitioner Versus Kumud Singh ….Respondent Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, J. Whether approved for reporting ?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Rajender Singh Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge(Oral): Learned Additional Advocate General, has placed on record communication dated 17.09.2026, wherein, it has been stated that petitioner’s pension case was successfully forwarded to the Office of Accountant General (A & E), H.P. on 15.09.2026. 2. Therefore, in view of the above, at this stage, no further order is required to be passed in the present contempt petition and accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to revive the present contempt petition, as and when the occasion arises. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge September 25, 2026 (reena) 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement?