Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
107
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M No.21075 of 2026
Date of decision: 20.04.2026
Ginny
…Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
…Respondent
CORAM:
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU
Present :- Ms. Rashika Bansal, Advocate for
Mr. Vikramjit Singh, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Sahil Chowdhary, AAG, Punjab.
***** MANDEEP PANNU, J. (Oral)
CRM No.16664 of 2026
This is an application under Rule 3(i) of Chapter 6 Part B Volume 5 of the Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules and Orders seeking exemption from filing Roll of Advocate.
For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed subject to all just exceptions.
CRM-M No.21075 of 2026
1.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner intends to withdraw the present petition.
2.
Permitted to do so.
3.
Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
4.
Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(MANDEEP PANNU) 20.04.2026
JUDGE neetu Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether Reportable: Yes/No NEETU RANI 2026.04.20 17:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, CHD