Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30549 WP No. 38778 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 38778 OF 2025 (KLR-LG) BETWEEN:
LAKSHMAMMA, D/O EERAIAH, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, THOGARIGUNTE VILLAGE, ANKASANDRA POST, CHELUR HOBLI, GUBBI TALUK, TUMKURU DISTRICT - 572 117. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. N.MANJUNATH, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, AMBEDKAR VEEDI, BENGALURU - 560 001.
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, TUMKUR DISTRICT, TUMKUR - 572 101.
3.
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, TUMAKURU SUB-DIVISION, TUMAKURU - 572 101.
Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30549 WP No. 38778 of 2025
4.
THE COMMITTEE FOR REGULARIZATION OF UNAUTHORIZED CULTIVATION OF LAND AND OFFICE OF THE TAHSILDAR, GUBBI TALUK, GUBBI - 572 216.
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
5.
THE THASILDAR, GUBBI TALUK, GUBBI, TUMAKUR DISTRICT - 572 216.
6. LAKSHMAIAH, S/O ERALINGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, THOGARIGUNTE VILLAGE, ANKASANDRA POST, CHELUR HOBLI, GUBBI TALUK, TUMKURU DISTRICT - 572 117. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SPOORTHY HEGDE N., HCGP FOR R1 TO R5;
SRI.K.R.RAMESH, ADVOCATE FOR R6)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH OR SETTING ASIDE THE IMPUGNED PROPOSAL DATED 28.11.2025 PASSED BY THE R-5 HEREIN THE TAHSILDAR, GUBBI TALUK IN E-COMP.NO.693065 FILE NO.TOGUB-ADM0LND/363/2025 AT ANNX-A AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30549 WP No. 38778 of 2025
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER
1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.
2. In this petition, the petitioner is assailing the proposal dated 28.11.2025 (Annexure-A) passed by respondent No.5.
3. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and on careful consideration of the internal communication between respondent No.2 and respondent No.5 dated 28.11.2025 (Annexure-A) it is noted that the same is based on the Order dated 28.10.2013 in Revision Petition No.5/2014 dated 26.09.2017 on the file of the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal.
4. In that view of the matter, as the said order has reached finality and the impugned order at Annexure-A is only to implement the order passed by the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal, I am of the view that no interference is called for in this petition.
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30549 WP No. 38778 of 2025
5. Accordingly the petition is rejected.
All pending I.As do not survive for consideration. Accordingly, dismissed.
SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
GH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8