- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31704 WP No. 34714 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO. 34714 OF 2017 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. SUSHEELAMMA W/O K.C. KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, PRESENTLY WORKING AS CHIEF ACCOUNTS OFFICER, KARNTAKA SLUM DEVELOPMENT BOARD, BANGALORE. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. P. CHANGALARAYA REDDY, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. THE PRINCIPAL DIRECTOR KARNATAKA STATE AUDIT AND ACCOUNTS DEPARTMENT, T.TANK BUILDING, 3RD FLOOR, A BLOCK, BANGALORE - 560 027. 2. THE COMMISSIONER KARNATAKA STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, N/O.366, 2ND GATE, 3RD FLOOR, M.S.BUILDING, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE - 560 001. 3. WG.CDR GB ATHRI(RETD), NO.52, "DHATRI", 3RD CROSS, Digitally signed by SUMA B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31704 WP No. 34714 of 2017 SARASWATIPURAM, BANNERGHATTA ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 076. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SRINIVAS KUMAR M, HCGP FOR R1; SRI. SHARATH GOWDA G.B, ADVOCATE FOR R2; R3 - WG. CDR, GB ATHRI (RETD) - SERVED) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 7.4.2017 AT ANNX-T PASSED BY R-2 AND IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 2.6.2017 AT ANNEX-U PASSED BY R-1 AND DIRECT R-2 TO DROP ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER AGAINST THE PETITIONER AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL ORAL ORDER On 19.06.2026, this Court passes the following order: "None appears for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondent No.2 submits that the copy of the writ petition is also not been served. In the interest of justice, matter is adjourned to 25.06.2026 on payment of cost of Rs.500/- payable to the Karnataka State Legal Services Committee. It is made clear that if there is no representation on the next date of hearing, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31704 WP No. 34714 of 2017 appropriate orders including dismissal would be passed." 2. Even today there is no representation. 3. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 is present. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- (M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE SPV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4