Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24621 (HP)

KISHORI LAL v. THE HRTC AND OTHERS

EX.P./2169/2026 · 2026-09-23

Sandeep Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.2169 of 2026 Date of Decision: 23.9.2026 _____________________________________________________________________ Kishori Lal ……...Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and Anr. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Mr. Het Ram Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. V.S. Kanwar, Advocate. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) By way of present execution petition, prayer has been made by the petitioner for implementation and execution of order/judgment dated 10.10.2025, passed by this Court in CWP No. 15977 of 2025, titled Kishori Lal v. Himachal Road Transport Corporation and Ors., whereby afore petition came to be disposed of with a direction to respondent/competent authority to consider and decide case of the petitioner in light of Sheela Devi within a period of four weeks. Since no action, whatsoever, came to be taken at the behest of the respondents pursuant to aforesaid direction, petitioner has approached this Court in the instant proceedings. 2 2. Mr. K.S. Kanwar, Advocate, appearing for the respondents, states that though he has every reason to presume and believe that by now, order/judgment sought to be executed, must have been complied with in its totality, but if not, same would be definitely complied with within a period of three weeks from today. 3. Consequently, in view of the fair stand adopted by the learned counsel for the respondents, this Court sees no reason to keep the present petition alive and accordingly, same is disposed of with direction to the respondents to do the needful in terms of judgment alleged to have been violated within a period of three weeks, failing which petitioner would be at liberty to get the present petition revived so that appropriate action in accordance with law is taken towards implementation of the order/judgment. September 23, 2026 (Sandeep Sharma), (manjit) Judge