2026:JHHC:26139-DB 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 6222 of 2026 Maa Tara Infrastructure & Builders Pvt. Ltd., represented through its Director Robin Singh, son of Pitambar Singh, resident of Village- Punsia, P.O.- Bindapathar, P.S.- Nala, District- Jamtara ... ... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2.The Chief Engineer, Jharkhand Police Housing Corporation Limited, having its office at Police Nigam Bhawan, Old Police Line, Line Tank Road, P.O. & P.S.- Lalpur, Ranchi ... ... Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Kaushik Sarkhel, Advocate Mrs. Rajni Singh, Advocate For the Respondent No.1 : Mr. Vibhor Mayank, A.C. to A.G. For the Respondent No.2 : Mr. Krishna Murari, Advocate Mr. Ritesh Kumar Pathak, Advocate Mr. Raj Vardhan, Advocate ----- Order No. 03 Dated: 31.08.2026 1. Heard Mr. Kaushik Sarkhel, who appears with Mrs. Rajni Singh for the petitioner, Mr. Vibhor Mayank, learned A.C. to A.G. for the respondent no. 1, and Mr. Krishna Murari for the respondent no. 2. 2. Mr. Krishna Murari, the learned counsel for the respondent no. 2, submits that the financial bid of one Mr. Manoj Kumar Pandey has been accepted in this matter and he has been declared as L-1. 3. Besides, in this petition, we note that this petition was basically instituted to challenge the declaration of the petitioner’s technical bid as non-responsive and to challenge the acceptance of the technical bid of Mahadeva Enterprises. Even Mahadeva Enterprises was not impleaded as a party to this petition. 2026:JHHC:26139-DB 2 4. Further, even the petitioner’s representation dated 27.02.2026 to the respondent no.2 was not reconsidered. 5. Considering the pleadings and the structure of the original petition, the learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a comprehensive writ petition, if so advised, by considering all the above aspects. He states that this would facilitate seeking of appropriate and comprehensive reliefs and also impleading all necessary and proper parties in the petition. 6. Considering the above submission and the circumstances, we grant the petitioner leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition, if so advised, on the same cause of action. However, we clarify that all contentions of all parties are left open since we have not adverted to them in this petition. 7. The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty in the above terms. No costs. (M. S. Sonak, C.J.) (Rajesh Shankar, J.) August 31, 2026 Manish/Ritesh Uploaded on 01.09.2026