2026:HHC:7173 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 15866 of 2025 Decided on : 16.03.2026 Tajender Kumar …Petitioner Versus Union of India and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Ankit Chandel, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Balram Sharma, Deputy Solicitor General of India. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) After making his submissions for some time and confronted with the issue of maintainability of the petition on the basis of the preliminary objections raised by the learned Deputy Solicitor General of India, the petitioner prays for and is allowed to withdraw the petition, with liberty to invoke the jurisdiction of the appropriate Fora. It goes without saying that in case limitation comes in the way of the petitioner while invoking the 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:7173 jurisdiction of the appropriate Fora, then the time spent by the petitioner bonafidely while pursuing his remedy before this Court, shall be sympathetically taken into consideration by the Fora concerned. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge March 16, 2026 (Shivank Thakur)