Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24617 (JHR)

RASHMI REKHA NAG v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/5672/2026 · 2026-08-29

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:26107 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 5672 of 2026 --------- Rashmi Rekha Nag, aged about 59 years, W/o- Late Sushil Kumar Nag, R/o- Smile and Braces Dental Clinic, First Floor, Pushpa Enclave near Gaon Restaurant, Old Loadih, P.O. & P.S.-Namkum, Ranchi, Dist.-Ranchi, Jharkhand-834010. ....Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Secretary, Department of Home, Jail and Disaster Management, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, P.O. & P.S.- Dhurwa, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. 3. The Director General of Police, Government of Jharkhand, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Dhurwa, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand 4. The Deputy Commissioner, East Singhbhum, P.O. & P.S.- Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbhum, Jharkhand. 5. The Superintendent of Police, East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur, P.O. & P.S.- Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbhum, Jharkhand. ....Respondent(s) --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Neil Abhijeet Toppo, Advocate Mr. Aman John Tirkey, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Subham Mishra, A.C. to S.C. (Mines)-II --------- 02/Dated: 29.08.2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner praying therein for the following reliefs: For issuance of appropriate writ/writs, Order/Orders, Direction/Directions or a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondent to dispose the representation of the petitioner dated 14.05.2026 whereby she has requested for fixation of Family Pension in terms of the 7th Central Pay Commission recommendation. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner is fully entitled for the prayer made in the instant writ application; however, in spite of repeated representations the grievance of the petitioner has not been redressed. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents fairly submits that since no counter affidavit has been filed; as such, the 2026:JHHC:26107 2 petitioner may be directed to approach the concerned respondent by filing a fresh representation, who shall look into the matter so that the grievance of the petitioner can be redressed. 5. Having regard to the aforesaid submissions and without going into the merits of the case, the instant writ application is hereby disposed of by directing the respondent No.3 to look into the grievance of the petitioner by treating this writ application as representation and take a decision in the matter in accordance with law and applicable rules and regulations by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 10 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order and communicate the same to the petitioner and if the case of the petitioner is found favourable, consequential benefits be extended to the petitioner within a further period of two weeks. The petitioner shall serve a copy of this writ application along with the relevant documents to the concerned respondent for convenience. 6. Pending I.A., if any, also stands closed. (Deepak Roshan, J.) AUGUST 29, 2026 vikas/- uploaded 02/09/2026