APHC010509512021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] MONDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION Nos: 7465 & 6964 of 2021 Crl.P.No.7465 of 2021 Between: 1.PALAKOLLU SUJATHA,, W/O. RAJESWARAO, AGE 51 YEARS, R/O. K.P.ESTATE, D.NO.5-91-18/5, KPS BHAVAN, 4TH LINE, LAXMIPURAM, GUNTUR. 2.PALAKOLLU KRISHNA PAVAN,, S/O. RAJESWARAO, AGE 32 YEARS, R/O. K.P.ESTATE, D.NO.5-91-18/5, KPS BHAVAN, 4TH LINE, LAXMIPURAM, GUNTUR. 3.PALAKOLLU SRI RAMYA,, D/O. RAJESWARAO, AGE 30 YEARS, R/O. K.P.ESTATE, D.NO.5-91-18/5, KPS BHAVAN, 4TH LINE, LAXMIPURAM, GUNTUR 4.PALAKOLLU RAJ KAMAL,, S/O. RAJESWARAO, AGE 32 YEARS, R/O. K.P.ESTATE, D.NO.5-91-18/5, KPS BHAVAN, 4TH LINE, LAXMIPURAM, GUNTUR. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY IT'S PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT ARNARAVATHI. 2.VENUGOPAL ANIL KUMAR KARAVADI, S/O. CHANDRARNOULI VENKATA CHAL, AGE 61 YEARS, R/O.FLAT NO.GD, RAJKAMAL TOWNSHIP, GORANTLA, GUNTUR URBAN, GUNTUR TOWN AND DISTRICT. 2 ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1.BODAPATI VAMSI KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1.RAMAKRISHNA AKURATHI 2.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) Crl.P.No.6964 of 2021 Between: 1.PALAKOLLU RAJESWARAO, S/O. RAGHAVAIAH, AGE 52 YEARS, R/O. K.P.ESTATE, D.NO.5-91-18/5, KPS BHAVAN, 4TH LINE, LAXMIPURAM, GUNTUR. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY IT'S PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT AMARAVATHI. 2.VENUGOPAL ANIL KUMAR KARAVADI, S/O. CHANDRAMOULI VENKATA CHAL, AGE 61 YEARS, R/O.FLAT NO.GD, RAJKAMAL TOWNSHIP, GORANTLA, GUNTUR URBAN, GUNTUR TOWN AND DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1.BODAPATI VAMSI KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1.RAMAKRISHNA AKURATHI 2.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER: 3 Despite the matter having been listed, there has been no representation on behalf of the Petitioners. Even after affording sufficient opportunity, neither the Petitioners nor their Counsel have chosen to appear or prosecute the case. It is also pertinent to observe that the present case constitutes one of the oldest matters pending on the roster. The non- appearance of the Petitioners, despite the long pendency of the matter, reflects a lack of diligence. In view of the absence of representation and the failure to advance arguments, this Court is of the opinion that the Petitioners are not interested in pursuing the present proceedings. Accordingly, the Criminal Petitions are dismissed for non- prosecution. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 09.03.2026 VTS