Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24611 (CHH)

KHOMAN SINGH v. SHRAVAN KUMAR SAHU

WPC/2342/2022 · 2026-06-30

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:26836 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2342 of 2022 1 - Khoman Singh S/o Late Gyanendra Singh Aged About 21 Years R/o Village Semariya Tahsil Aarang, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Nagendra Singh S/o Late Harendra Singh Aged About 41 Years R/o Village Semariya, Tahsil- Arang, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Dharmendra Singh S/o Late Harendra Singh Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Semariya, Tahsil- Tikrapara, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Shravan Kumar Sahu S/o Hemlal Sahu Aged About 32 Years R/o Village Dunda, Police Station- Tikrapara, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner(s) :- Mr. Vivek Tripathi, Advocate For State :- Mr. Anand Dadariya, Dy. A.G. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order On Board VISHAKHA BEOHAR Digitally signed by VISHAKHA BEOHAR 2 01.07.2026 1. The petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 That, the order dated 10.02.2020 as passed by Learned Board of Revenue Bilaspur may kindly be quash and consequently order passed by Additional Commissioner, Raipur and Tahsildar Aarang in favour of the Dhansai may kindly be set -aside/quash. 10.2 That, Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper may also be passed in favour of the petitioner.” 2. After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to avail the appropriate remedy by initiating appropriate proceedings before the competent forum against the judgment and decree/order passed by the concerned Civil Court. 3. Prayer is allowed. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Vishakha