APHC010510512024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] TUESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2848/2024 Between: 1. DASARI NAGA MALLESWARA RAO, S/O.CONGRESS, HINDU, MALE, AGED 38 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.1-138, SURAPPAGUDEM VILLAGE, BHIMADOLE MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. ROBBA RAMPRASAD, S/O.APPARAO, HINDU,MALE, AGED 46 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.26-1-7, CHINAGANTYADA VILLAGE, GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2. VEJJU SATYANARAYANA, S/O.LATE VENKANNA, HINDU, MALE, AGED 52 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.6-57-6/3, SRAMIK NAGAR, GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to Petitioner begs to present this Memorandum of Civil Revision Petition against the Return Order dated 08-11-2024 in EA. SR No. 6692 of 2024, dated 01-11-2024 In E.P No. 195 of 2024 in O.S. No. 32 of 2018 on the file of the court of learned II Addl. District Judge, Eluru, W.G.Dist., 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceeding in E.P.No.195 of 2024 in O.S.No.32 of 2018 on the file of the court of Learned II Additional District Judge, Eluru, West Godavari District, pending disposal of the main CRP and to pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CHAKRALA SARAT CHAND Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: On 09.03.2026, due to series of adjournments on the ground of non representation for the petitioner, this Court directed the Registry is post this matter under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 2. Despite the matter being listed under the caption for dismissal, on 23.03.2026, learned counsel for the petitioner appeared through virtual mode and sought time and the matter was adjourned. 3. Today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. This shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. 4. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 31st March, 2026 RKS