Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24600 (PNJ)

JASHAN SIDHU AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/7279/2026 · 2026-06-22

Parmod Goyal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

-1- 130 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-7279-2026 Date of Decision: 22.06.2026 JASHAN SIDHU AND ANOTHER ...Petitioners Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Sarvesh Kumar Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners. Dr. D.S. Lamba, Addl. A.G., Punjab. PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL) The petitioners through instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India are seeking protection of their lives and liberty as guaranteed by Article 21 of the Constitution of India. 2. Notice of motion. 3. On the asking of the Court, Dr. D.S. Lamba, Addl. A.G., Punjab, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. Service of notice to the private respondents is dispensed with as no adverse order is passed against them. 4. As per petition and documents enclosed therewith i.e. Aadhar Card issued by the Government of India, petitioner No.1-Jashan Sidhu is aged 19 years and petitioner No.2-Navreet Kaur is aged 21 years. 5. The petitioners have made a representation dated 15.06.2026 (Annexure P-3) to Senior Superintendent of Police, District Moga seeking CHIRANJEEV SINGH 2026.06.22 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document -2- protection of life and liberty. The petitioners have no apprehension of causing any injury on the part of the police or other Government authorities whereas they are claiming that there is apprehension that their relatives may cause injury and put their lives in danger. 6. The official respondents are directed to examine the representation of the petitioners in accordance with law and to ensure protection as per threat perception. The disposal of present petition shall not be construed as protection to petitioners from their civil or criminal liability which, if any, they have incurred in past or may incur in future. This order further would not legalize their relation, if not permissible by law in force. 7. Disposed of. (PARMOD GOYAL) 22.06.2026 JUDGE chiranjeev Whether Speaking/Reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No CHIRANJEEV SINGH 2026.06.22 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document