1 APHC010507112008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 26260/2008 Between: 1. V.NAGA RAJU, SRIKAKULAM DIST., S/O.BALA RAMA RAJU HIRAMANDALAM POST AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. HIRAMANDALAM P A C S LTD SRIKAKULAM DIST 2 OTHERS, HIRAMANDALAM POST AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT. 2. THE DIVISIONAL COOPERATIVE OFFICER, TEKKALI, TEKKALI (POST AND MANDAL), SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. THE DISTRICT COOPERATIVE OFFICER, SRIKAKULAM, GUJARATHIPETA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the order of the 1st respondent dated 31.10.2008 dismissing the petitioner from the service of the 1st respondent society as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the Rules 72 of APCS Rules 1964 and special byelaws issued by the Commissioner & Registrar of Cooperative Societies and consequently direct the respondents to 2 reinstate the petitioner into service with all consequential benefits and pass such other order or orders. IA NO: 1 OF 2008(WPMP 34385 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the orders of 1st respondent dated 31.10.2008 dismissing the petitioner from service of the 1st respondent as Secretary, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S SIVA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR COOPERATION (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 26260 of 2008 ORDER:- When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri S.Siva Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that in view of subsequent events taken place in the lis, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication. 2. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 03.03.2026 ASR 4 33 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 26260 of 2008 03.03.2026 ASR