IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP No. 16762 of 2026. Decided on :25 th September , 2026 Jaswant Kumar ...Petitioner. Versus HRTC & Ors. ....Respondents. Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Bhim Raj Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Notice. Mr. Deepak Sharma, learned counsel appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Petitioner’s grievance is that his representation (Annexure P- 6), seeking applicability of Sheela Devi vs. State of H.P. & Ors.2 has not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be content in case the respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned counsel for the respondents is not averse to this prayer. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2CWPOA No. 195 of 2019 decided on 26.12.2019. 2 3. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 25th September, 2026. (jai)