APHC010505012024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] TUESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 26199/2024 Between: 1. SRI DHARMA SHASTA CONTRACTORS, REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER A MURALI MOHAN RAO, S/O. A VENKATA NARASAIAH, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCC. CONTRACTOR, R/O. 18-91, KONDAPETA, BANAGANAPALLI, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT, PINCODE. 518124. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 4. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, PR CIRCLE, KUMOOL, KUMOOL DISTRICT. 5. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PR (PIU) DIVISION, NANDYAL @ KUMOOL, KUMOOL DISTRICT. 6. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF MINES AND GEOLOGY, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the Respondents not releasing the amount of Rs.10,46,901/-, even after finalizing the bills, payable to the petitioner in relation to the works i.e., Providing internal CC roads in main village of Krishnagiri, vide Agreement No. /2023-24, dated 18.07.2023 is questioned, as the same is illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to pay for payment of amount of Rs.10,46,901/- with interest @24 percent per annum for the delayed gimount to the petitioner in respect of execution of above-mentioned work forthwith and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to pay for payment of amount of Rs. 10,46,901/- with interest @24 percent per annum for the delayed amount to the petitioner in respect of execution of works i.e. Providing internal CC roads in main village of Krishnagiri, vide Agreement No. /2023-24, dated 18.07.2023, forthwith. pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BATHALA RAMESH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 2. GP FOR MINES AND GEOLOGY 3. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: Heard Ms. Naseem Sultana, learned counsel representing Sri Bathala Ramesh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri P.Rajesh Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development, 3 appeared for the respondents 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6 and Ms. Usha, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appeared for the 3rd respondent. 2. The above writ petition was filed to declare the action of the respondents in not releasing the amount of Rs.10,46,901/- (Rupees Ten Lakh Forty Six Thousand Nine Hundred and One only), payable to the petitioner in relation to the works i.e., providing internal CC Roads in Main Village of Krishnagiri Village of Banaganapalli Mandal vide Proceedings Rc.No.07PR/DMF/BPL/NDL/2022 dated 01.05.2023 issued by the District Collector and District Magistrate, Chairman, DMFT, Nandyal. The Quality Control team inspected on 01.12.2023 and submitted a report on 05.12.2023. Despite the completion of the work, the amount was not released to the petitioner. 3. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, Sri P.Rajesh Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader, submitted instructions of Executive Engineer, PR (PIU) Division, Nandyal-5th respondent dated 15.09.2025, wherein it is stated as follows: “It is humbly submitted that an amount of Rs.11,99.762/- has to be paid to the petitioner, required documents and letter for requirement of grant has been submitted to the Deputy Director of Mines and Geology, Nandyal. As and when funds are released, Net amount of Rs.10,46,901/- will be released, to the petitioner, after deducting the statutory recoveries of Rs.1,52,861/-.” 4 4. Thus, as seen from the instructions submitted by the Executive Engineer, PR (PIU) Division, Nandyal-5th respondent, since there is no dispute regarding execution of the aforementioned work and the amount payable to the petitioner, is undisputed and admitted, the writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is maintainable. In M/s Utkal Highways Engineers and Contractors v. Chief General Manager & Ors1, it was held at Para No.8 as under: “Be that as it may, the High court has not dealt with the merits of the writ petition. Moreover, it is not an inviolable rule that no money claim can be adjudicated upon in exercise of writ jurisdiction. Non-payment of admitted dues, inter alia, may be considered an arbitrary action on the part of respondents and for claiming the same, a writ petition may lie. Further, throwing a writ petition on ground of availability of alternative remedy after 10 years, particularly, when parties have exchanged their affidavits, is not the correct course unless there are disputed questions of fact which by their very nature cannot be adjudicated upon without recording formal evidence.” 5. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to release/pay an amount of Rs.10,46,901/- (Rupees Ten Lakh Forty Six Thousand Nine Hundred and One only), within a period of three (03) months from the date of receipt of the copy of this order. No order as to costs. 1 2025 SCC online SC 1400 5 As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 20.01.2026 SNI 6 175 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 26199 OF 2024 Date: 20.01.2026 SNI