Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24593 (CHH)

ABDUL SHAMSAD KHAN v. CHHATTISGARH STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LIMITED,

WPC/3280/2026 · 2026-06-30

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:CGHC:26814-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3280 of 2026 Abdul Shamsad Khan S/o Abdul Rajjak Khan Aged About 71 Years R/o Godripara Chirmiri District- Manendragarh-Chirmiri -Bharatpur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Chhattisgarh State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, Through- Its Managing Director Block No.7-A Second Floor Office Complex Sector -24 Atal Nagar Nava Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - District Manager Chhattisgarh State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited Manendragarah District- Manendragarh-Chirmiri-Bharatpur (C.G.) ...Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : Shri Akash Deep Sharma, Advocate For Respondents : Shri Animesh Tiwari, Advocate --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board Per R amesh Sinha, Chief Justice 01.07.2026 Heard Shri Akash Deep Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Shri Animesh Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondents. 1. Petitioner has filed this petition for the following reliefs: “10.1. This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash and set aside the impugned letter dated 16.01.2026 (Annexure P-1) passed by respondent no. 02, in the interest of justice. Wpc 3280 of 2026 2 10.2. This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash and set aside the impugned communications/letters dated 20.04.2026 (Annexure P-8) and 23.04.2026 (Annexure P-9), whereby the respondents have reiterated and enforced execution of the work at 70% above SOR in the interest of justice. 10.3. This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent corporation to accept the petitioner's bid submitted at 170% above SOR in strict accordance with the terms of the Notice Inviting Tender dated 07.10.2025 (Annexure P-2), or in alternative, to cancel his tender without imposing any adverse consequences upon him. 10.4. This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other writ/writs, order/ orders, relief/ reliefs in favour of the petitioner, which the Hon'ble Court deem fit & just in the facts and circumstances of the case, including awarding of the costs to the petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing for some time, prays for withdrawal of this petition with liberty to revive the same if occasion arises. 3. Accordingly, petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice padma Digitally signed by V PADMAVATHI Date: 2026.07.03 11:54:05 +0530